The Unabomber: Is He Serious? Essay -- essays research papers

The Unabomber Is He Serious?There comes a time when everyone has something to say. The next stepwould be to key someone to listen. If that doesnt work, I suppose you justhave to make them listen.The Unabombers Manifesto was probably one of the most interesting andthought provoking points of view that I have read in a while. Its just too badthat every time he made a point that I could rival with, he would contradicthimself before I was finished with the paragraph. In my opinion, the entiremanifesto and every viewpoint expressed therein, was a strange mix of confusion, incident and storytelling. Although written with an abundance of detail and manystrong convictions, I finished reading the selection without being able to seethe purpose behind it altogether and what he stood to gain. Im sure that wasntexactly his intentions when he wrote it.I feel there is one thing the author deserves credit for right from thestart his uncanny exponent to set a pessimistic mood. From the minute yo uglance at the introduction, he, assuming the author is male, begins to paint apicture of destruction and demise of the world in which we live. What couldcause such a catastrophe? According to the author, it would have to be industryand technology of all things. He was convinced that due to the industrial-technological remains in which we live, ultimately humans are going to besubjected to world wide suffering and inevitably a total shut down of humanity. immediately at this moment I felt a little disbelief. I had heard he was actually anintelligent person, notwithstanding I was starting to wonder. His unhurt theory was based on the fact, that at one point or another,the human race will be taken to the point of complete come out down. He feels thatif its bound to happen, we should make it happen now. The longer we wait, themore people will suffer. Now, I know our sun will eventually burn out, so doesthat mean that it should be the concern of everyone on the planet to devise amet hod to destroy it immediately and save us the trouble of having to do it posterior? I guess I wasnt too surprised when I read how he intended to induce anearly break down with a revolution, scarcely the next thing I read left me a littleconfused. I was interested in how and when he planned to d... ...here who actually make a difference. Technology was a turning point in mans struggle in life. When wewere first learning to use it, we used it for the wrong reasons. I believe were travel past that now. We dont fear technology deal he does any more. More andmore people, including older generations are learning to use it. Not becausethey have to, but its only natural for the majority of us to try something new.When everyone begins to use it, working together, thats what advances us intotomorrow. If everyone was as pessimistic as he, where would we be? Sometimesit takes someone like him to remind us what we used to be and how we used tothink. It helps us all stay on track. In the long run, he just becomes someonewho wouldnt reassign and society will forget him. Its ironic to think that wealready have. People dont want war, revolution, or violence. We dont need tobe the aggressor and more. Our survival isnt assured, but at least we have themeans to provide it, to really harvest it when that need arises. People likethe Unibomber only give us the motivation to keep on going. And what do we haveto thank for our advancement? Technology.